Sometimes the world seems like a pretty dull place. While science has given us a greater understanding of the world we live in, sometimes it seems like it has sucked all the magic and wonder out of it too. Wouldn’t it be great if there really were monsters lurking in the woods outside your house? Well, perhaps there once was. Although most of the things that scared you as a child, those things that go bump in the night, were actually just creaking attic beams and groaning attic pipes, perhaps the children of previous generations really did have something to be afraid of. After all, don’t most legends have a basis in fact?

Here are five mythical creatures that could exist, or rather that could have existed long ago.

Everybody knows the story. Everybody’s seen the video of a man in a gorilla costume taking a leisurely stroll through the woods. But is there any truth behind the tales of this big-footed missing link?

Well, the most famous film recording of Mr Bigfoot, shot in 1967 by Roger Patterson, is widely believed to be a fake for obvious reasons. However scientists have been unable to provide any evidence to either prove or disprove its authenticity. Instead, scientists and sceptics have focused on the sheer impossibility of Bigfoot’s existence. Most ecologists agree that the climate of North West America is simply unable to support a species of great ape such as this, and certainly not in the numbers required to maintain a breeding population. For that matter, any population large enough to ensure the continuation of the species would be pretty hard to hide, making Bigfoot sightings much more common than they actually are.

The slim possibility does remain that the Bigfoot species is in decline and near extinction. But if this were so, such a rapid population decline since the arrival of European settlers would have seen the species become completely extinct long ago.

Of course there are tales of hairy woodsmen predating the widespread colonization of North America. Native American folklore is crammed with references to Bigfoot, although the descriptions they give of the creature’s appearance, behaviour and temperament vary wildly. Most depict Bigfoot as a kind of bogeyman who feeds off of the flesh of naughty children. Of course, when Bigfoot is viewed in this context it could be said that there are Bigfoot stories in the folklore of every culture the world over.

Why is this? Well we humans seem to have a need to fantasise about big hairy monsters, perhaps because we once lived alongside them. It’s possible that aural tradition has preserved, if somewhat distorted, the story of how we once shared our earth with a real-life missing link – the Neanderthal – around thirty thousand years ago.more

Another myth that would seem to be as old as time itself is that of the vampire. The vampire is one of the most enduring legends of all time and, like the big bad bogeyman, there would seem to be a version of this myth in almost every culture on the face of the planet.

Of course the descriptions of these blood sucking creatures varies wildly from country to country. In South East Asia, for example, there are seemingly endless variations on the same theme. Here, vampires usually take the form of a beautiful young woman. Some can detach their head or torso so as to fly about the night sky. Some have no fangs but drain the blood from their victims using their hair. Others use an elongated tongue to lap the blood, or even to suck foetuses from the wombs of sleeping women. Even Bigfoot is said to be a bloodsucker in at least one Native American version of the myth.

Even our own vampire folklore cannot be taken at face value. The modern vampire has evolved from an impressive variety of European vampire myths. For example, the association with bats was the invention of Bram Stoker, author of Dracula. Before the nineteenth century vampires more commonly turned themselves into cats or dogs. A stake through the heart might not kill a vampire. Originally, spears were used to simply steak them to the ground as killing them was thought by some to be impossible. Garlic might not do you much good either, as it was only placed in the mouths of corpses to stop them biting people. An onion would do just as well but the most effective precaution one could take was to completely remove the head before burial.

Vampires even looked different back then. Far from being pale they were often described as being dark in complexion and ‘of a foreign disposition’. They didn’t even have fangs.

However the vampire might have altered over time, it is clearly part of a long tradition of things that go bump in the night, the true origins of which might never be determined.

If there is any evidence for the vampire walking amongst us today, it comes in the form of the chupacapre. The chupacabre, or ‘goat sucker’, has been annoying farmers in South and Central America for several decades now by sucking their cattle, and other animals, completely dry of blood.

A number of recent sightings, and even video footage, of strange creatures in the region have some claiming that the chupacabre is some form of mutant cayote or previously undiscovered dog-like creature. To others, however, it has a much more alien or demonesque appearance. Perhaps, like the vampire, it is capable of appearing as both humanoid and animal form.

Loch Ness is not the only lake in Scotland or even in Europe to claim the existence of a strange waterborne creature within its depths. However, it is the most famous.

The legend of the Loch Ness Monster has been handed down from generation to generation for many hundreds of years, attracting speculation, investigation, and many different interpretations of the myth. In that time there have been many recorded sightings and an equal number of hoaxes, making it very difficult to tell fact from fantasy.

The first written account of a ‘monster’ sighting in Loch Ness dates back to the seventh century and is part of a retrospective biography of Saint Columba. It tells the story of how the saint saved a group of local fishermen from a vicious river serpent using his aqua-man like powers of persuasion. Of course this is far from historical fact; the story was written many years after Columba’s death and, let’s face it, those medieval Christians could be pretty creative with the truth, especially if it helped them to convert a few heathens.

1933 saw a spectacular revival of the myth when George Spicer and his wife reported seeing ‘an extraordinary animal’ crossing the road towards the loch. The story was published in a local newspaper where Spicer described the creature as having a long neck, flippers and carrying a dead animal in its mouth – today’s typical Nessie profile. The media went into a frenzy and swamped the shores of the lock in search of further witnesses, quickly finding that almost every person in the area had their own monster story. This was to be the start of decades of intense public interest and a virtual siege of the loch. Ever since the first photograph of the monster was taken, a year after Spicer’s encounter, hardly a day has gone by without at least one camera keeping watch over the waters of the loch. The number of videos and photographs taken by ‘Nessie watchers’ in that time is staggering but as of yet none have been conclusively proven to be genuine. Scientists have since joined the hunt too, using sonar sweeps to scour the loch, all to no avail.

So is there really such a thing as the Loch Ness Monster? Well, probably not. There is certainly no prehistoric sea creature living on Loch Ness today. Even the most camera shy plesiosaur would have had to come up for air by now. But this does not mean that there never was a Loch Ness Monster. Perhaps in the middle ages there really was some great unknown creature living in the depths of Ness and Loch Morar, where Nessies cousin, Morag, is reputed to live. In fact, similar legends are told right across Europe causing some to speculate that these were the last remaining members of a once prevalent, now extinct species.

When you stop and take a moment to think about dragons, chances are you have a very specific image in your mind of what this mythological creature looks and acts like, depending on whatever your formative dragon experience was.

So you might find it weird that a dragon can actually be a lot of different things to different people. A lot of the differences in dragon representations are cultural; for example, Westerners trend more towards a dragons-are-evil mythos, while others, especially the Chinese, revere dragons as bringers of luck. Dragons have also changed over time; we’ve somewhat overcome our stereotypical dragon sensibilities in favor of the more modern notion of seeing dragons as ‘people,’ or at least assigning some sort of human or uber-human characteristics to them.

Below is a handy guide to the panoply of dragons in movies that might, perhaps help you learn how your ideas of what a dragon is came to be, and whether or not those ideas are terribly wrong. The entries are listed roughly in chronological order, so you can see the evolution of dragon representations over time.

Could be a good dragon. We don’t want to judge on this picture alone.

No representation of dragons in movies is more traditionally Western than that of Maleficent in Sleeping Beauty. If you went back a few centuries and showed this movie to a bunch of townspeople… well, first of all they’d flip out over seeing moving pictures… and then they’d probably torture you and burn you at the stake for performing witchcraft. After that they’d all sit down together and say, “Yeah, looks like a dragon to me!”

A lot of Western myths use dragons as symbols of the devil. There are no redeeming factors, nothing besides true, unadulterated evil to this terrifying creature. The fact that this dragon actually is a wicked witch just tops off the perfect image of everything we’ve come to know about good and evil.

Are dragons supposed to be that hairy? There might have been some miscommunication with the drawing department here.

This is another dragon that’s pretty one-dimensional; however, we’re starting to get a bit more into the mythos of dragons with this character. We can’t say for sure if Tolkien invented the idea of a treasure-hoarding beast living forever in a cave, but he invented pretty much everything else we know of as fantasy, so it’s a fair bet.

This dragon eats people, destroys towns, is greedy, and thinks only of himself. At least Maleficent only put people to sleep and blows a bit of fire now and then. This is possibly the worst-behaved dragon on our list.

Look! That dragon is copying Mickey Rooney’s facial expressions!

We’re not sure exactly what to make of this. The same year that brought us Smaug also brought us Elliot, the misbehaving dragon that may or may not have been a figure of Pete’s imagination induced by too many beatings or excessive drug use. Of course, by the end everyone can see Elliot, so maybe the drugs were in the water?

Maine has always been a kind of ‘live and let live’ place, so it’s no surprise that they set a movie with a heart-of-gold dragon in a town there. Still, although Elliot cares for Pete very much, he’s got some characteristics that wouldn’t be tolerated in an upstanding human citizen. He loves pranks such as pulling out a lady’s slip and getting egg all over people’s faces. And that’s the true essence of dragons – whether they’re good or bad, they’re never entirely human, and don’t necessarily play by our societal rules.

Drugs were most definitely involved in the making of this movie.

This is the first movie on our list based roughly on Eastern folklore. Falcor is a luckdragon, which you might be surprised to find out isn’t a real actual thing; however, especially in Chinese culture, dragons are considered lucky; so that’s basically where the inspiration behind Falcor came from.

His ability to talk is an important distinction, because talking makes a mythological creature much more human than not-talking. It’s easy to write something off as purely good or purely evil based on actions; when that same thing talks, the whole equation gets a lot more complicated. Falcor himself is complex. He seems to have powers that he can use for good, and yet he allows the human characters to make their own mistakes. Either he’s very smart, or he’s kind of a dick. We’ll say for the sake of argument that he’s mostly good, with a bit of unpredictability thrown in.

Draco’s just your regular guy, trapped in a dragon’s body.

Here’s another dragon who has the talking thing down. We first see him trying to take down the hero of the movie, so we figure right away that he’s not a very nice guy.

What we learn later is that things are much more complicated than they seem. The main evil-uber-bad dude has half the dragon’s heart (hence, the title of the movie!) and the evil guy can’t be killed unless the dragon is killed. And did we mention that the dragon is also the last of his kind? Oh, the moral quandries! Who knew the mid-90’s were so complex?

In the end (spoiler alert!) the dragon sacrifices himself to save the people from the evil king. So, he turns out ‘good’ in the end – although we have to ask if sacrificing yourself for members of another species, most of who hate your guts, really qualifies.

Mushu has the dubious honor of being the smallest dragon on our list. But size doesn’t matter, right?

Mushu is another dragon who is roughly styled after Chinese dragon mythology, although, as usual, the moviemakers have taken liberties.

Again, here is a dragon that tends to get in trouble. Dragons are pretty much always troublemakers, have you noticed this? We suppose they wouldn’t be very interesting if they just sat around drinking tea all day, but it does limit a dragon actor’s repertoire.

Luckily, most of Mushu’s trouble-making does seem to turn out okay in the end, so we guess that he’s on the good side.

True love at its most ridiculous!

We’re going to go ahead and say that this is a step back for dragon kind. We’re not sure exactly what they’re trying to say with this dragon character.

First of all, she’s a killer who has already killed several knights trying to rescue Fiona. So bad, right? Well, it turns out she’s not really evil, just really lonely. Um, we guess we can get behind that. Then she pretty much has her way with Donkey, which we don’t think is really the right message to be sending anyone.

After that she escapes her bonds, what does she do? She mopes by a lake and waits for Donkey to find her. He, by this time, has somehow fallen in love with this creature who breathes fire and is about 100 times his size. Why? We don’t see them conversing. She doesn’t speak. She’s more like a pet. And then she roasts a bunch of guards. So, it’s hard to call her truly evil, but she is all kinds of weird.

They seem to have confused ‘dragon’ and ‘hairy snake.’

Haku starts out as a spirit-boy who works to save the human girl who has stumbled into the spirit realm to save her parents, who’ve been turned into pigs. Yep.

He’s not exactly a dragon, per-se; he’s a river spirit who has lost his way. In his confusion, he forgets who he really is and helps a witch do her bidding. He ends up doing some things that aren’t very nice, but this story is very true to the nature of Japanese folklore; no one character is either all good or all bad. Things are just the way they are. And everything turns out okay in the end, so we’ll stick Haku on the good side.

We think it’s upset. Just a guess.

These are by far the most animalistic and least human dragons on the list. They don’t talk or in any way communicate with humans.

The thing is, if dragons existed on Earth, we’d consider them animals. You could argue that a dragon-like creature could have evolved a higher intelligence than other creatures, but there’s no saying that it would be the kind of intelligence that we would understand or even recognize. So it would be alien to us. The dragons in the Harry Potter movies are just that – animals who live, eat, fight, breed, and die. We see through Hagrid that even the strangest of creatures should be respected, but the dragon characters are clearly just what they look like – glorified dinosaurs. And you can’t really assign good and evil to animals. Although their status as wizard-killers, and their attempt to chomp the lovable Harry Potter, don’t put them in a very good place in our eyes.

Emma Larkins is a freelance writer. To learn more about her work, follow her on Twitter or check out her blog.

Written by Emma Larkins – Copyrighted © www.weirdworm.com

Image Sources